From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 28 07:35:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3350A106566C; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:35:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B248FC15; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279C21FFC53; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A9C8E844F3; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:35:17 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Alexander Motin References: <4BD06BD9.6030401@FreeBSD.org> <4BD099E6.6000402@FreeBSD.org> <4BD0A689.8000508@thekeelecentre.com> <4BD0ACD2.3040805@FreeBSD.org> <86och53tpl.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4BD6EDD6.8010403@FreeBSD.org> <86fx2h3rr6.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4BD6F797.5090205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:35:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4BD6F797.5090205@FreeBSD.org> (Alexander Motin's message of "Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:41:27 +0300") Message-ID: <86wrvst4ga.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Maxim Sobolev , FreeBSD-Current , Richard Tector , freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Switchover to CAM ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:35:52 -0000 Alexander Motin writes: > I haven't dug really deep into current ataraid(4), but AFAIK it is all > done in software. At least there is no any offloading support on the > controller drivers level. None of ata(4) drivers do anything except > executing one ATA command at a time. Correct. That doesn't mean they *shouldn't* use offloading. Like I said, I started working on checksum offloading for Promise SATA controllers, but ZFS came along and I replaced the controllers because of data corruption issues (which turned out to be either a driver bug or a PCI timing bug which sos@ worked around in the driver, I forget which) > Any URLs? Google "Promise FastTrak SATA RAID" I have two or three of those, including one with on-board SDRAM (but no battery backup) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no