From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 29 18:04:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BB716A4CE for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:04:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F3443D49 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:04:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so623670rne for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:04:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=gFWDAUcExsD8Tgip0ul0lUGU6QguGwivZqTdyc+1DhBdsC5Pl0vYbO5pjXSWr1U9js1uB/ZCmtmP5DxNZjXKh4cLNnZzz6srQI98Fy6X0c3bLZCxDT2/KWAUmyAdb304e5GdabAw4rpkutoVdjhAvjTbo+MzwyNJ/e/TmZWiUIc= Received: by 10.38.72.21 with SMTP id u21mr143839rna; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:04:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.74.6 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:04:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:04:13 +0100 From: Gert Cuykens To: Kirk Strauser , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200501291147.17252.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200501291147.17252.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: message for port developers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:04:15 -0000 On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:47:02 -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Saturday 29 January 2005 11:42 am, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > Cant be that hart to do or am i mistaken ? > > Unfortunately, you're mistaken. Some of those option screens would cause new > ports to be installed, so before building the top-level port you'd have to > recursively walk the dependency list to configure those other ports, store > the user-chosen options somewhere, and then re-walk the dependency list to > actually build them. > > Sure, it *could* be done, but I imagine it'd involved a huge amount of effort. > -- > Kirk Strauser So any plans for tomorow :P