From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 18:28:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8777C879; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from keltia.net (cl-90.mrs-01.fr.sixxs.net [IPv6:2a01:240:fe00:59::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BFC29C8; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lonrach.local (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:ee87:4a00:8598:3a55:4c44:3bb0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roberto) by keltia.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 076FC52AE; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:27:54 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch to improve AES-NI performance Message-ID: <20130823182752.GA15392@lonrach.local> References: <20130822202027.GH94127@funkthat.com> <20130823151615.GD41379@roberto02-aw.erc.corp.eurocontrol.int> <20130823180413.GL94127@funkthat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130823180413.GL94127@funkthat.com> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / MBP 4,1 - FreeBSD 8.0 / T3500-E5520 Nehalem User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:28:10 -0000 According to John-Mark Gurney: pjd did not merge (as he said at the time of commit) r226839 & r226839. Is there any objection to merge these two (and possibly 247061 as well -- copyright update)? > > You repeated r226839 twice. What is the correct second revision? You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the "code" one. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/