From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 24 13:42:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA1F16A403 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B040843D5A for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:41:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB79EB821 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:41:58 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <911B338C-38E0-4952-986C-F9DBC82E99BE@lassitu.de> References: <6196E612-1611-4D81-BF50-8E54DED00480@khera.org> <911B338C-38E0-4952-986C-F9DBC82E99BE@lassitu.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-854007869; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:41:57 -0400 To: FreeBSD Stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: kernel ignores kenv comconsole_speed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:42:00 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1-854007869 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Oct 23, 2006, at 6:19 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote: > Am 23.10.2006 um 17:46 schrieb Vivek Khera: > >> On Oct 20, 2006, at 6:59 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote: >> >>> I have -DS115200 in /boot.config, and boot and loader are happily >>> using this speed. However, the kernel appears to be hardwired to >>> 9600. >> >> I've only ever gotten it to work when /boot.config looks like "-D - >> S115200". I don't think you can merge the -S flag with the >> others, at least according to my read of the man page. > > As I said, boot and loader are happily using 115200, but the kernel > uses the compiled-in default. I'll file a PR the next few days, > hopefully with a patch. As I said, "works for me". I wonder what it is you are going to patch? Did you try it with the separate -S option? Did it work? --Apple-Mail-1-854007869--