From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 19 19:17:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E73B106566B; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C248FC18; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:915f:fe51:3cf1:9d19] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:915f:fe51:3cf1:9d19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 288775C37; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:17:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <50085D4C.60901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:17:32 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <20486.55903.34769.952614@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <500729B3.1050208@FreeBSD.org> <20487.20506.88401.623249@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20488.23232.578561.75939@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <20488.23232.578561.75939@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org, Chris Rees , Kevin Oberman , Doug Barton Subject: Re: libreoffice fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:17:28 -0000 On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote: ... > Let me be clear: > There is at least one person out there who has successfully > built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2? The version of clang in base is 3.1. I have successfully compiled LibreOffice with it, and it even seemed to run OK, though I didn't test it very thoroughly. There were several other posters which confirmed the same. Apparently in r301038, jkim updated the libreoffice port to use the lang/clang-devel port instead, which is built from a very recent 3.2 snapshot. I have no idea if LO compiles successfully with that. Maybe you found a problem with the clang-devel port. :)