From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 17:28:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1F216A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:28:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geekout@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3809C43D48 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:28:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geekout@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1553wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:28:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=c4eHOSzElSn5I1lHYVEIuaLqSCS+PL4h7mHZh6EXZHiMLcBRpmK5Hi5rZe4uTrQLxtLwD1bgy5UH8IfRhE+AsGKA3D7IpCllkewvVzbbv1if7ipjLoZwZ5vgqfoNWwm/AcFkJwfZ5rdJcjmexzqKmq+P5TDxNj9Ragxy6ITnRuc= Received: by 10.54.68.4 with SMTP id q4mr1344wra; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.127.1 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6e01203b050726102878decdfb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:28:55 -0600 From: Tyler Gee To: Julian Elischer , FreeBSD Current In-Reply-To: <42E5A208.8050009@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42E583F9.3070703@rogers.com> <6e01203b05072517336be50b45@mail.gmail.com> <42E5A208.8050009@elischer.org> Cc: Subject: Re: More dhclient gayness X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tyler Gee List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:28:57 -0000 > what is the derogatory part? > I must have missed it.. I think there is a better way to describe dhclient acting weird than by saying saying it is "dhclinet gayness" (Unless, of course, what he really meant is that it is happy and, therefore, working fine.)