From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 14:51:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F8916A401; Sun, 6 May 2007 14:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F6213C489; Sun, 6 May 2007 14:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.14.0/8.14.0/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id l46ERLd3028723; Sun, 6 May 2007 10:27:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]); Sun, 06 May 2007 10:27:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 10:27:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Edwin Groothuis In-Reply-To: <200705061420.l46EK9LX090026@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <200705061420.l46EK9LX090026@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/112462: x11-toolkits/xview uses libc internal function __svfscanf() X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:51:32 -0000 On Sun, 6 May 2007, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Synopsis: x11-toolkits/xview uses libc internal function __svfscanf() > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->deischen > Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > Responsible-Changed-When: Sun May 6 14:20:08 UTC 2007 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Submitter has GNATS access I can certainly apply my fix, but I don't use xview nor know if it breaks it in some way. vfscanf() is a locked version of __svfcanf(), so it might break something. I'll apply the fix this weekend unless someone tells me not to ;-) -- DE