From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb 23 04:31:38 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id EAA01132 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 04:31:38 -0800
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id EAA01125 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 04:31:34 -0800
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA00698
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Thu, 23 Feb 1995 06:05:25 -0600
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA10422; 23 Feb 95 05:20:07 CST (Thu)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id FAA10418; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 05:20:06 -0600
Message-Id: <199502231120.FAA10418@bonkers.taronga.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: bonkers.taronga.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: Stephen Hocking <sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Will our efforts become redundant? (Plan 9 low cost) 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Feb 95 02:01:54 GMT."
             <199502230201.CAA24544@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au> 
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.4.1 7/21/94
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 05:20:03 -0600
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I wouldn't worry. I don't think Plan 9 is freely redistributable, so it's
going to be harder to get the oomph behind it. Pity.