From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 3 00:07:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B41616A4CE; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 00:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616A843D45; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 00:07:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd01.aul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BVmJl-0002sf-0C; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 09:07:13 +0200 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (bNOz9YZHwewImiITfpO+1jaU5b4fsxxduHNCIs4JbZVNk9BjeRtVYQ@[80.131.122.246]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1BVmJg-0ZXyzY0; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:07:08 +0200 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i5377L2P041789; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:07:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:08:44 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: FreeBSD ports Message-Id: <20040603090844.30574032@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200406022144.i52Lia74058841@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> References: <200406022144.i52Lia74058841@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: bNOz9YZHwewImiITfpO+1jaU5b4fsxxduHNCIs4JbZVNk9BjeRtVYQ@t-dialin.net cc: eik@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ports with version numbers going backwards: lang/icc X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 07:07:16 -0000 On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 17:44:36 -0400 (EDT) Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one ** > > For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that > version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time. > Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for > more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade > and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH. > > - *lang/icc* : icc-8.0.066.p067.1 < icc-8.0.066_1 > | revision 1.69 > | date: 2004/06/02 17:04:54; author: netchild; state: Exp; lines: +1 -2 > | Update to 8.0.066.p067.1. I'm alittle bit surprised. AFAIR I tested this naming scheme with portupgrade several times at the time we started to use it. I haven't tested this particular update with portupgrade though. Any suggestion how to handle this? Bye, Alexander. -- I'm available to get hired (preferred in .lu). http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7