From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 25 18:45:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D4416A422; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:45:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mv.twc.weather.com (mv.twc.weather.com [65.212.71.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7F043D58; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:45:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.50.40.201] (Not Verified[10.50.40.201]) by mv.twc.weather.com with NetIQ MailMarshal (v6, 0, 3, 8) id ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:00:49 -0400 From: John Baldwin To: Garance A Drosehn Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:11:00 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200508241938.j7OJcSNW066686@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508251011.02844.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/pkill pkill.1 pkill.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:45:40 -0000 On Wednesday 24 August 2005 06:26 pm, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > At 6:14 PM -0400 8/24/05, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > >I'd slightly prefer something other than adding another option, > >but I can't think of anything which is particularly better. The > >only other suggestion might be to have "daemon.lpid" filenames > >instead of "daemon.pid", but that also seems icky to me. > > To extend that a bit: it might be nice if daemons which used > the new library would create "daemon.lpid" files, just so it > is easy to tell which pid-files are using the new code. But I > think it would be ugly for `pkill' to alter its behavior based > on the filename given... Yeah, I think that's uglier than a new option personally. :) I'm ok with the -L approach. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org