From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 23 15:56:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF3123D2 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C6691D48 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id o15so2425344qap.30 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:56:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2K4bmMRkWU+Q1ppJWkToNax1Ps4Mph/V4L6ShEbR+yA=; b=iPdk2O+fueFtCr0PvtGo+yi6yu177CGQbDCSXhLx1qGspm3JPttRnOI02hLUrn/T27 vvZTzSc0uI1GfTZDcGMCnOCibmsQuNiCym+sSM2dc/AbZ7yla/G7OrGKoAxQzlHJfMnq sL+7MbQOtLmZ4D99hJc3/LYGbbn7QPIXCsYLDmonExkI0ZJ0fq4M/5aKuxaETxR4Qrz2 rUbZ1MfD6nCiPD5ytpeEmY/RWSgTiZwJoETkg9vJ5mtLGBfekUaUvFYIk+QyqkVW/Imz OnDyuUjYiqz9Cyu3qbMeET5Quuj1KUqz2HnjUiCJKse59fSfVdkwAV13ymXQpv/vaxj9 V2ng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.101.104 with SMTP id t95mr11910013qge.106.1390492577579; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.37.227 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:56:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:56:17 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS: pool vs FS From: krad To: Chris Stankevitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:56:18 -0000 1. Filesystems, not pools, can be mounted correct pools are imported, however every pool as a root dataset/file system, this is automatically mounted normally to the specified mount point. This isnt necessary the same as the pool name. This may not happen if various filesystem tunables are set (canmount, mountpoint=legacy, jailed,zoned) or import options set (-N -R) 2. "zpool create foo /dev/bar" makes new pool called foo correct, with a root dataset, mounted on $pool_name by default 3. (2) does not create a file system false see (1) 4. After (2), /foo is mounted and ready for writing not always see (1) 5. (4) violates (1) false On 22 January 2014 20:25, Chris Stankevitz wrote: > Please identify any incorrect statements: > > 1. Filesystems, not pools, can be mounted > > 2. "zpool create foo /dev/bar" makes new pool called foo > > 3. (2) does not create a file system > > 4. After (2), /foo is mounted and ready for writing > > 5. (4) violates (1) > > Thank you, > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >