From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 7 18:46:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70993106564A; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 18:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [69.147.83.54]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C9C14D8AD; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 18:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5071CDFA.4000807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:46:18 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20121001 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <201209242123.q8OLNp8Q002624@svn.freebsd.org> <5070A2F6.205@FreeBSD.org> <20121006220758.GC22164@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5070AD5F.5020002@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r304800 - in head: . textproc textproc/aspell textproc/aspell-without-dicten textproc/en-aspell X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:46:19 -0000 On 10/07/2012 11:09, Chris Rees wrote: > On 6 October 2012 23:14, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 10/06/2012 15:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 02:30:30PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> On 09/24/2012 14:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>>> No longer install the english dictionary (please use textproc/en-aspell if you >>>>> want the english dictionary) >>>> >>>> What was the motivation for this change? >>>> >>> Motivation is simplifying binary package, this was stupid to have 2 different >>> ports for aspell + one port for the dictionary, when we do not lose any features >>> with having a single aspell port not incompatible with another one. >> >> Makes sense, thanks for the explanation. >> >> It would probably have been useful to include that in the commit >> message, for future reference. Ideally commit messages should be roughly >> 2/3 "why", and 1/3 "what." >> > > 3/3 "why", 0/3 "what"-- we have inline SVN diffs nowadays! Yeah, but they don't show up in the logs. -- I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what I can do. -- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)