From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 23:20:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C8716A422 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:20:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50D643D5A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:20:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so712912wra for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:20:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lTu2ijBWRIE/BzXNiLOIGME5dCaSj3HUBx1xwswCu0zZyAitwNXifnSY/yjLiE0r7yv0ic7EUA+/03blSI0e680efq0tmGbtGV03vmqwebTY+gUAZ71pR203mTZ55dENt24g8C7Z68y8wstAdwsSNKvy3Uyhb66rLYlhVlpP8GE= Received: by 10.54.82.10 with SMTP id f10mr3666497wrb; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:20:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.113.12 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:20:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0602261520y7a3e16dy@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:20:13 +0000 From: Chris To: "Chuck Swiger" In-Reply-To: <4401CE90.2080703@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200602261627.27483.freebsda@fuckaround.org> <4401CE90.2080703@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Pol Hallen Subject: Re: rl0 discard oversize X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:20:17 -0000 On 26/02/06, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Pol Hallen wrote: > > Hi all :-) > > > > I have a fbsd 5.4 > > today while copy a lot files (several Gb) the network saturation...and > don't > > responding of ping :-( > > > > in dmesg i see: > > > > rl0 discard oversize frame (ether type 4a82 flags 3 len 38118 > 1514 > [ ... ] > > where is the problem? > > With the rl0 hardware, probably. Realtek NICs aren't very good, and I've > seen > similar reports from other people which were resolved by getting a dc0 or > fxp0 > NIC instead. > > > this is my main server.. and indispensable 4 my work! > > > > sorry 4 my bad english...and thanks! > > Your english is OK... > > -- > -Chuck > _______________________________________________ I wonder if anyone has the time to rewrite the realtek driver because whenever anyone posts about rl0 the advice is always ditch the card, I agre= e that realtek's are the reliant robin class of lan cards but the problems people see do not happen on other operating systems with the same hardware, eg. I have never seen that mtu problem on debian or windows but I have had it myself on freebsd, I also get poor realtek performance but when I tried linux with the same hardware it was normal. Datacentre's far too often wil= l supply a realtek card with the machine so its not always possible or affordable to simply ditch for a new brand. If someone does have the time to look at the driver it would be great and I would be available for testin= g as I use realtek cards at home for my lan. Chris