From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 23 10:45:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D4EDF2 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C327226D9 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ur.dons.net.au (ppp118-210-72-17.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net [118.210.72.17]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r6NAigUY012418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:14:49 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: x11-toolkits/blt on Tcl 8.4 From: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: <8529D937-31CD-4163-ADF5-D2567FBEE06B@dons.net.au> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:14:43 +0930 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0F51657C-759B-4871-9351-F047CDA55F80@dons.net.au> References: <8529D937-31CD-4163-ADF5-D2567FBEE06B@dons.net.au> To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Spam-Score: 0.163 () BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 203.31.81.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:45:09 -0000 On 20/07/2013, at 17:50, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > I recently tried updating our custom FreeBSD install and one thing we = use is Tcl 8.4. I discovered that Blt doesn't build against Tcl 8.4 due = to patch-use-tkInt. >=20 > Is there an easy way to make it skip that patch for Tcl 8.4? Also, it seems that change from _VERSION to _PATCH_LEVEL breaks loading = - it complains it wants 8.4.20 even though that is what tcl_patchLevel = says. I am happy to split it out into a separate patch for >8.4 and combine it = with patch-use-tkInt but I don't have the portsFu to apply a patch = selectively. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C