From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 19:56:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619CD4F5 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38B1F28C for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (pool-173-70-85-31.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [173.70.85.31]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F128B921; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:56:29 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poor state of the build infrastructure. Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:54:54 -0400 Message-ID: <1643827.epFl9jnZN1@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (FreeBSD/10.0-STABLE; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4496BEA3-9F6C-4F09-B8F6-68D97A331A60@xcllnt.net> References: <4496BEA3-9F6C-4F09-B8F6-68D97A331A60@xcllnt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:56:29 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Marcel Moolenaar X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:56:30 -0000 On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 09:29:48 AM Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > What is going on here? > Are we still in some kind of flux and people aren't done yet or is > this the intended state by virtue of noone having anything left on > there TODO list? Sorry to ask a dumb question, but are you sure you did the make buildworld first? Shouldn't that have errored if it couldn't build crt1? I think if you haven't done a make buildworld/toolchain, then when you do make buildenv you will fall back to using the host tools: > make TARGET=sparc64 buildenv Entering world for sparc64:sparc64 $ echo $PATH /usr/obj/sparc64.sparc64/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/sparc64.sparc64/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/sparc64.sparc64/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/sparc64.sparc64/usr/src/tmp/legacy/bin:/usr/obj/sparc64.sparc64/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/sparc64.sparc64/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/sparc64.sparc64/usr/src/tmp/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin $ which cc /usr/obj/sparc64.sparc64/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/cc $ which cat /bin/cat -- John Baldwin