From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Jun 18 17:35:10 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC948A78FE9
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CC11B86
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:35:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id B7189A78FE7; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:35:10 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4816A78FE6
 for <ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:35:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990551B84
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:35:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
 [24.5.143.190]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u5IHZ9vH062463
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host
 c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190] claimed to be
 yuri.doctorlan.com
Subject: Re: Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different
 compared to 10,3 compiler?
References: <64e51a34-fced-4f7f-2a3f-9508c6c24b39@rawbw.com>
 <20160618172005.GA19494@home.opsec.eu>
To: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
Message-ID: <ae480e24-4510-f203-4071-e05e481e6d48@rawbw.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:35:08 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160618172005.GA19494@home.opsec.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:35:10 -0000

On 06/18/2016 10:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> >There are two questions:
>> >1. Why clang36 works differently on 10.1 and 10.3?
> Good question. Additional patches went into 10.3, probably ?


It looks like compiler on 10.1 is broken, because c++11 or c++14 isn't 
(fully) supported there.
Now these fallout messages will keep coming and nothing can be done to 
fix them.

Yuri