From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 15:00:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDF016A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:00:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E1843D1F for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:00:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB8N0lFY092832 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:00:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hB8N0lNP092831; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:00:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:00:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200312082300.hB8N0lNP092831@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Pav Lucistnik Subject: Re: ports/60055: Repocopy x11-fonts/ttmkfdir to x11-fonts/ttmkfdir2 to avoid installation of freetype1. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pav Lucistnik List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 23:00:49 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/60055; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pav Lucistnik To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, thierry@pompo.net Cc: Subject: Re: ports/60055: Repocopy x11-fonts/ttmkfdir to x11-fonts/ttmkfdir2 to avoid installation of freetype1. Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 23:59:18 +0100 Any reason for keeping freetype1 ttmkfdir in the tree? Does it produce different output than freetype2 version? I just checked INDEX and only 5 ports have ttmkfdir as a dependency, and it's build-time dependency anyway. -- Pav Lucistnik