From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Jul 29 5:54:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C7514DD3; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 05:54:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost (billf@localhost) by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA18354; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 07:55:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 07:55:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Doug Cc: Tim Vanderhoek , green@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/11121: w(1) cannot handle more than one user on command line In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Doug wrote: > > I never leave a PR open as an MFC reminder. There are too many open > > already. > > Ok, how would you suggest that we implement a system where PR > fixes get MFC'ed on a more regular schedule? What we really want to avoid > is having things updated in the dreaded "super-commit" fashion that tends > to happen right before a -Release is cut. By MFC'ing in smaller bits over > a longer period of time things get tested better, -Release's are less > traumatic, and everyone is happier. > > Any ideas? A new state in GNATS would seem smart. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message