From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 13  1:59:18 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-239.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.239])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DBD5E37B402; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 01:59:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4EAE266C76; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 01:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 01:59:11 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>,
	Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: eaccess(2) breaks execution of 4.x binaries on 5.x
Message-ID: <20020313015911.A87604@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20020313081047.R16064-100000@news1.macomnet.ru> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203122131420.72756-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203122131420.72756-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>; from julian@elischer.org on Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:33:32PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:33:32PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> any change that has to be added to 4.x tomake it run on 5.x is the wrong
> answer.
> 4.x binaries should all run on 5.x (unless something was accidentally
> committed to 4.x that should be backed out.)
>=20
> any change for allowing 4.x binaries to run on  5.x should be done on the
> 5.x side of things,
> (unless I've misunderstood the problem here)

Yes: see my followup.

Kris

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8jyLvWry0BWjoQKURAjK9AKCD0JP/H+L/e6srJyetm/QLvdYPwgCcCJSg
QAOiOv3V2udcGODjt9Yd9mw=
=o62S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message