From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 09:24:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D24316A4BF for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA7B43F85 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:24:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8UGOXOH028500; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:24:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost)h8UGOXBQ028499; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:24:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:24:33 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Eriq Lamar Message-ID: <20030930162433.GA28475@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <200309301152.05556.eqe@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309301152.05556.eqe@cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is 5.1 now more stable than 4.9rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:24:57 -0000 On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:52:05AM -0400, Eriq Lamar wrote: > It just seems that there are alot of issues w/ 4.9, doesn't seem stable at > all. > The answer is probably "no". Of course, your vague statement about 4.9 not being stable makes it hard to judge whether 5.1 is a better choice than 4.9. -- Steve