From owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 16:24:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565D9BB0DCE; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu [IPv6:2a02:2770:15:0:21a:4aff:fe1b:d1ad]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2776E173A; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from len-t420.klaas (unknown [IPv6:2a02:908:d722:7b00:224:d7ff:feec:38e0]) by mx.box-hlm-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00A1C2C3592; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 18:23:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 18:23:43 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firewalling jails and lo0 Message-ID: <20160806162343.GE5566@len-t420.klaas> Reply-To: stdin@niklaas.eu Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org References: <20160806155411.GA5289@len-t420.klaas> <57A60D1F.80500@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57A60D1F.80500@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:24:11 -0000 Ernie Luzar [2016-08-06 12:15 -0400] : > > This bug report will answer your questions for non-vimage jails. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210049 Thanks a lot. So I stumbled upon a security issue? And the only way to work around this is by using vimage jails? While vimage refers to some virtualisation of the network /within/ the jails? Niklaas