From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed May 31 20:24:30 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA26676 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 31 May 1995 20:24:30 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA26670 for ; Wed, 31 May 1995 20:24:27 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id UAA03781; Wed, 31 May 1995 20:27:28 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id UAA02206; Wed, 31 May 1995 20:24:37 -0700 Message-Id: <199506010324.UAA02206@corbin.Root.COM> To: fcawth@squid.umd.edu (Fred Cawthorne) cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with 2.0.5-Alpha and SMC Elite Ultra Combo's BNC??? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 31 May 95 22:18:12 EDT." <9506010218.AA13668@squid.umd.edu> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 20:24:36 -0700 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >Has something changed with the ed0 driver using the SMC Elite 16C Ultra >combo card?? I get "device timeouts" when I try to use the thing with Yes; when the kernel is configured for the board to be at a specific irq, the board must be at that irq or you'll get the timeouts. The previous behavior was to always assume that the soft-configed irq that was read from the board was the irq to use. This caused the driver to be quite broken for people using the "hard" settings. You can have the old behavior if you specify "irq ?" in the config file or 0 or -1 in userconfig (-c at bootup). -DG