From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Oct 3 0: 0:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E8E37B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA62149; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:00:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 00:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010030700.AAA62149@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: ports/21720: Update port to use ADNS. Reply-To: Peter Pentchev Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/21720; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev To: peterh@sapros.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/21720: Update port to use ADNS. Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:51:42 +0300 On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 11:36:21PM -0700, peterh@sapros.com wrote: > >Synopsis: Update port to use ADNS. [snip] > --- gale.bak/patches/patch-ab Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969 > +++ gale/patches/patch-ab Mon Oct 2 23:25:38 2000 > @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@ > +--- configure.orig Mon Oct 2 23:25:16 2000 > ++++ configure Mon Oct 2 23:25:19 2000 [snip 370+ lines of patch] Hmm wouldn't it be generally better, with ports using GNU configure scripts, to patch configure.in, define USE_AUTOCONF in the port Makefile, and have bsd.port.mk invoke autoconf to regenerate the configure script? G'luck, Peter -- I am the meaning of this sentence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message