From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Dec  6 07:53:55 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA23834
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 07:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freebsd.netcom.com (freebsd.netcom.com [198.211.79.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA23805
          Wed, 6 Dec 1995 07:53:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bugs@localhost) by freebsd.netcom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA06141; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 09:50:35 -0600
From: Mark Hittinger <bugs@freebsd.netcom.com>
Message-Id: <199512061550.JAA06141@freebsd.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Second appeal for sup, CTM, mail and www servers. Please help! (fwd)
To: hackers@freebsd.org, announce@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 1995 09:50:35 -0600 (CST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
>Stupid question:  Is this just a matter of "donated machine" or
>is it more than that (bandwidth) too?  Would another machine next
>door to freefall be a valid approach?  In particular, freely speaking
>for some of us (:-), I'd say many of us would be willing to chip in,
>say, $20 to $100 (each!) towards a dedicated machine.  Would this
>approach work to give freefall a buddy?

Here here!  I'd be willing to "chip" in :-)

Regards,

Mark Hittinger
Netcom/Dallas
bugs@freebsd.netcom.com
voice: 214-550-6175