From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 02:15:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8430616A41C; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:15:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.village.org (vc4-2-0-66.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CF243D1F; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:15:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5L2EG5e029697; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:14:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:15:26 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050620.201526.48202418.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <75027.1119295536@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20050620.125334.10575355.imp@bsdimp.com> <75027.1119295536@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rwatson@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a Soekris 4801 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:15:45 -0000 In message: <75027.1119295536@critter.freebsd.dk> "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: : I'm not saying that the problem is entirely solved, we are 90% of : the way there now, and the last 10% may simply not be worth it. I disagree. It is a solvable problem. However, some people are suggesting a 99.9% solution, whereas a 95% solution would likely suffice. We aren't there yet. Warner