From owner-freebsd-isdn Wed Jun 14 14:10:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from peedub.muc.de (p3E9B8F28.dip.t-dialin.net [62.155.143.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C36337B537 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 14:10:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.muc.de) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.9.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA38649; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 23:05:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200006142105.XAA38649@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: David Wetzel Cc: "Leif Neland" , freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: reject Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jun 2000 22:49:38 +0200." <200006142049.WAA00914@cat.turbocat.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 23:05:48 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Wetzel writes: >> From: Gary Jennejohn > >> Wait a second. If you have 2 devices on an S0 bus responding to the >> same number then I would expect a race condition to result. It doesn't >> seem reasonable to me to expect isdnd to reject calls for other devices >> on the bus. In fact, I would suspect that it would violate some standard. >> IMHO that's a function which a PBX should carry out. > >No. i4b/the anwering machine should answer the call and hang up. > Oh, the _answering machine_ handles it. Now I understand. But I had the impression from his mail that he wanted isdnd to reject calls for other devices on the S0 bus, which can't work AFAICT. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj@muc.de gj@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message