From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 30 14:01:52 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EDF106566B;
	Wed, 30 May 2012 14:01:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.217.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12898FC0A;
	Wed, 30 May 2012 14:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so5697lbo.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 30 May 2012 07:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=f9meUFtLumuqwcL3vizoJIhsoXQZOHFjoikWn3IxhuY=;
	b=iWQHL+xWZg90fGgB3yXlnm48idK2zP/YKZ2F11nvfMaazDpIjHePeLZqrY4GE4hCmS
	ibZTXGagzGKVxmLWRRFr6wTPWqERqvfHJV4Wgj138Rp9KuAk3N0X5dDIku1YUfROLgCD
	irHt+qnmTDeFKhKKjbleMO3W5dkPzD1mwx+9VeTbK8CJRkNopcF1LsLWw5URNUZW5E3p
	B/zI6hFlgZ9X7THaEKmx/SNSVvldTXIoKKGL2hAKzVu7qRFZYysWs23ORs0G901th8jy
	D3+32ZR2UnAtQ/Yoc5n45ZV3oXdJHOX0rKbg2XAPZixBAylPcf/RnxhZpFAPe8m7UISr
	63RA==
Received: by 10.112.23.196 with SMTP id o4mr6872119lbf.49.1338386509616;
	Wed, 30 May 2012 07:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.29.1.142] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hm7sm28003317lab.12.2012.05.30.07.01.47
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Wed, 30 May 2012 07:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FC62819.3090206@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:00:57 +0300
From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org>
	<4FC5F794.9050506@gmail.com>
	<20120530131437.GI9952@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120530131437.GI9952@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:01:52 -0000

Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Maybe it would be best if ports which otherwise don't have options, and
>> for which building docs don't require new dependencies would not put
>> DOCS and EXAMPLES into options? What do you think?
> 
> You can still switch to optionsng, if you don't define DOCS in OPTIONS_DEFINE
> but just use the if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} you are using optionsng but won't have
> the dialog showing up

That sounds sensible.

How should users activate/deactivate DOCS and/or EXAMPLES from command
line in this case? Should they use "make OPTIONS_UNSET=DOCS"?

> anyway yes NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES should disappear in long term

Right.