From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 29 09:11:35 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D7516A41A for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.lists@fsck.ch) Received: from secure.socket.ch (secure.socket.ch [212.103.70.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBD213C457 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.lists@fsck.ch) Received: from 84-75-182-249.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.75.182.249] helo=factory.fsck.ch) by secure.socket.ch with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IF4oG-000OPX-JZ; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:11:34 +0200 Message-ID: <46AC59C3.7080804@fsck.ch> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:11:31 +0200 From: Tobias Roth User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070721) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper References: <46AC527F.4010305@fsck.ch> <46AC58B0.6060808@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <46AC58B0.6060808@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "secure.socket.ch", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Garrett Cooper wrote: > That's not going to change until portversion changes. The problem is > most likely that portsnap touches the file and portversion finds it > necessary to update the portsdb. Processing the text from portversion > will yield the info you want. > Cheers, > -Garrett [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 1.6 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails 0.0 DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys Identified Mail: policy says domain signs some mails X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.75.182.249 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: freebsd.lists@fsck.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on secure.socket.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap from cron X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:11:36 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > That's not going to change until portversion changes. The problem is > most likely that portsnap touches the file and portversion finds it > necessary to update the portsdb. Processing the text from portversion > will yield the info you want. > Cheers, > -Garrett Ohh, now at least I have an idea why it is suddenly happening, and how to fix it. I'll either run portsdb between portsnap and portversion, or try to grep out the unneeded stuff. Thanks!