From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 14 10:39:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3F337B7E6 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:39:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA90812; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:39:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA45416; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:39:36 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200003141839.LAA45416@harmony.village.org> To: Maxim Bolotin Subject: Re: cs89x0 driver update (fwd) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:46:17 +0300." References: Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:39:36 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Maxim Bolotin writes: : We found that our driver doesn't work with PNP in 4.0 and : use old, shared memory softc scheme. We rewrite it for the : new scheme, now We can install it in dev/cs and remove : isa_compat.c lines. I belive we have to commit it before : 4.0 release. I suspect that it is way too late to be included in 4.0, but can be included in 4.0-stable once 4.0 is out the door. Since Jkh has put down the tags already and has started building I think that it can just goin to -current and -stable at the same time. Max, do you have commit privs? If not, then I'll shepard this into the tree. My company uses an allinone computer with the CS8900A on it and we need support for this chip. Warner [[ cc'd to current so committers there know it is being worked on ]] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message