From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May 12 11:29:59 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA17345
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 12 May 1995 11:29:59 -0700
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA17335
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 12 May 1995 11:29:53 -0700
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA02467; Fri, 12 May 95 12:23:13 MDT
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9505121823.AA02467@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: Apache + FreeBSD 2.0 benchmark results
To: adhir@iagi.net (Alok K. Dhir)
Date: Fri, 12 May 95 12:23:13 MDT
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950512090851.14561D-100000@bigdipper.iagi.net> from "Alok K. Dhir" at May 12, 95 09:10:44 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> How about you all take freebsd-hackers out of the cc line...?  I've had 
> it with the repeated forking quasi multitasking asychronous task 
> processing $#@$@#!$@#
> 
> ;-)

Me too.  It's an application performance issue, and FreeBSD isn't
interested in applications performance.  }B-).

Actually, if it must continue to be discussed, it should be moved
to the arch list or a CS class whiteboard.  8-).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.