From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 26 17:21:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA07625 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 17:21:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hwcn.org (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA07599; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 17:20:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by hwcn.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA01907; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 20:14:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 20:14:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Satoshi Asami cc: seggers@semyam.dinoco.de, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Concurrent package making allowed? In-Reply-To: <199806262343.QAA09289@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > (1) A new mandatory file pkg/SIZE, containing the number of bytes > required by the installation, to be submitted by the porter. Like Depending on the level of precision desired, the format should support multiple architectures. > via pkg_create, like you suggested). Maybe another target in > bsd.port.mk to verify it, but it has to ignore a difference of a > few bytes (few Kbytes?). Perhaps perform verification automatically when PACKAGE_BUILDING. The sizes are mostly useful for packages, since ports built from source will sometimes change their compilation to take advantage of other installed software. [PACKAGE_BUILDING is a variable defined when asami, jseger, and that other guy, go around building all the packages]. -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message