From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 10:22:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.Org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A29416A400 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70C8C13C458 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2007 10:22:29 -0000 Received: from vpn-cl-167-213.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [141.3.167.213] by mail.gmx.net (mp052) with SMTP; 21 Jun 2007 12:22:29 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+WofN/SOCWjRidtuvLhHtMJOK99e9RpJf9bKkReU z6N99bGYHT5Ol0 Message-ID: <467A5164.5080206@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:22:28 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070616) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.Org References: <200706211003.l5LA3cK1085839@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200706211003.l5LA3cK1085839@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: cad/freehdl X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:22:31 -0000 Bill distfiles Fenner wrote: > Dear lon_kamikaze@gmx.de, > > You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port > whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could > you please visit > > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/lon_kamikaze@gmx.de.html > > and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with > a problem is cad/freehdl. > > ... > > Thanks, > Bill "distfiles" Fenner. > I got this email a couple of weeks ago and a patch was commited within a couple of days. Now I get it again for apparently no reason. Shouldn't there be testing weather the problem persists, ere the mail gets resent?