From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 30 14:24:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E841E106564A; Wed, 30 May 2012 14:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB498FC1B; Wed, 30 May 2012 14:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4UEOkD6000565; Wed, 30 May 2012 14:24:46 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q4UEOkcA000564; Wed, 30 May 2012 14:24:46 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 16:24:44 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Vitaly Magerya Message-ID: <20120530142443.GJ9952@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org> <4FC5F794.9050506@gmail.com> <20120530131437.GI9952@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FC62819.3090206@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC62819.3090206@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Erwin Lansing Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:24:47 -0000 --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> Maybe it would be best if ports which otherwise don't have options, and > >> for which building docs don't require new dependencies would not put > >> DOCS and EXAMPLES into options? What do you think? > >=20 > > You can still switch to optionsng, if you don't define DOCS in OPTIONS_= DEFINE > > but just use the if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} you are using optionsng but w= on't have > > the dialog showing up >=20 > That sounds sensible. >=20 > How should users activate/deactivate DOCS and/or EXAMPLES from command > line in this case? Should they use "make OPTIONS_UNSET=3DDOCS"? exactly! >=20 > > anyway yes NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES should disappear in long term >=20 > Right. --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/GLasACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EywlgCgphy6Dp+fAzuZsyqvFNLC4KGu JmoAn36z600FrRii2ZYxv3HMqIAM6PE2 =Gdnt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6--