From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun 22 11:08:27 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA19349
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:08:27 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA19341
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:08:25 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with ESMTP id LAA05989; Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:07:39 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA00570; Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:08:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199506221808.LAA00570@corbin.Root.COM>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers),
        joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: nickkral@sextans.eecs.berkeley.edu (Nick Kralevich)
Subject: Re: more gritching on the net.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jun 95 19:43:55 +0200."
             <199506201743.TAA16054@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:07:54 -0700
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>>   Packets are still transmitted even though the UP flag is not turned
>>     on in an interface.
>
>Well, this is a bug, but rather a very low priority one (since i think
>it does no harm to anybody).

   I fixed it a few days ago. It had been that way since the SLIP code was
written many years ago. I guess nobody thought it was important enough to
fix.

-DG