From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 14:52:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9B216A420; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C0D43D6E; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:51:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9AEpri8043716; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:51:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <434A8011.8080908@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:52:01 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hiroki Sato References: <200510091329.j99DT5Bv001028@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051009162747.GA51517@hub.freebsd.org> <20051010.234153.21933676.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20051010.234153.21933676.hrs@allbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, delphij@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases/6.0R schedule.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:52:08 -0000 Hiroki Sato wrote: > Xin LI wrote > in <20051009162747.GA51517@hub.freebsd.org>: > > de> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:29:05PM +0000, Hiroki Sato wrote: > de> > Log: > de> > Document the actual date when RELENG_6_0 branch is created. > de> > de> Is it time to also bump RELENG_6_0 to 6.0-RC1, and RELENG_6 to 6.0-STABLE > de> or 6.0-PRERELEASE? I think that's the traditional practice... > > Well, updating newvers.sh was done on the same day, but this date > does not mean RELENG_6 unfreezed. The unfreezing does not always > happen at the same time. > > -- > | Hiroki SATO > Just FYI..... Both RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_0 are called 6.0-RC1 at the moment. I did this via a commit and a tag slip yesterday. In the past we've sometimes renamed the RELENG_N branch to N-STABLE while there are still RCs being released for RELENG_N_N. This has often caused a lot of confusion from users, so I'm trying to make it less confusing this time around. Hopefully there won't be a whole lot of RCs and we'll be able to get to 6.0-RELEASE quickly. If it looks like things will drag out then we might consider unfreezing RELENG_6 and changing the name to 6-STABLE. Fortunately the release is looking really good, and the only signficant problem left without a solution is the USB keyboard issue. Hopefully that can get resolved in the next few days. Scott