From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 25 19:35:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303FD106567C for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 19:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C998FC15 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 19:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4PJYo8p041204; Mon, 25 May 2009 21:34:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n4PJYoXe041201; Mon, 25 May 2009 21:34:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 21:34:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Glen Barber In-Reply-To: <4ad871310905251231x8c61c93j97bf364ebea8d533@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <200905241315.n4ODFB96007801@mp.cs.niu.edu> <4A1A58FA.60303@boosten.org> <1932D812-03CF-48AF-A306-669C39862EB7@boosten.org> <4ad871310905251231x8c61c93j97bf364ebea8d533@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Peter Boosten Subject: Re: How can this 'top' command output make sense? Load over 7 and total CPU use ~5% X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:35:03 -0000 > Not true. top(1) can fully utilize the CPU. Doing so does not put > the system under full load. top uses small percentage of CPU power. if it would use all - it WOULD mean full CPU load. >> >> load average is how much processes (by average) is not doing calculations >> because something is not yet available and depends of computer resources(*) >> - like CPU time, disk I/O results etc.. >> >> (*) - for example waiting on tty read is not calculated to load average as >> it's depends on human not computer. > > What? exactly what i wrote. reread if you don't understand. anyway i'm quitting this discussion as it's obvious for most people that can read what i mean and what CPU load/utilization mean.