From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs Mon Jan 20 14:20:11 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D198937B408; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64F443ED8; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:20:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C4E1FFF95; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:20:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id B1C581FFF92; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:20:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 0AE7615352; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DF915350; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:11:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Edwin Groothuis Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, , Christian Kratzer Subject: Re: ports/46009: New port: openldap-2.1 In-Reply-To: <200301200731.h0K7VR6n040893@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Edwin Groothuis wrote: Hi, > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr > Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 19 23:30:05 PST 2003 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Portmgr, could you please make a repo-copy of net/openldap2 to > net/openldap21 ? > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=46009 why do you want to copy over openldap2 ? This PR is supposed to be an entirely new port for openldap version 2.1. Openldap 2.0 is somewhat older but still used by a lots of other products. Openldap 2.1 is what is considered stable now. The 2.1 source is quite different from 2.0. There have been some major enhancements... IMHO a diff from openldap2 to openldap21 would make not much sense. So both ports should be there co-existing (at least for some time) I think. Why should openldap21 start with complete 2.0 cvs history predicting that this port had been there before openldap 2.1.x had been released ? or did I miss s.th. ? PS: expect an update to openldap 2.1.12 within the next days including some smaller beauty fixes to pkg-* and Makefile too. -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message