From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 21:49:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F47237F for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound-queue-1.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (outbound-queue-1.mail.thdo.gradwell.net [212.11.70.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5041861 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (bonnie.gradwell.net [212.11.70.2]) by outbound-queue-1.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7560A22F59 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:49:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from cpc7-jarr12-2-0-cust882.16-2.cable.virginm.net (HELO amd.asgard.uk) (92.238.71.115) (smtp-auth username fbsd%pop3.dgmm.net, mechanism plain) by outbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (qpsmtpd/0.83) with ESMTPA; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:49:07 +0100 From: dgmm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Handbook, upgrading ports incorrect with 10.0-RELEASE? Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:49:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4634538.SMM6loVsS1@amd.asgard.uk> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.4 (FreeBSD/9.2-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.12.4; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <0558889B-6B6C-40E2-95DD-70DDA98B51F4@gmail.com> References: <534520DE.5060005@relst.nl> <534565E9.8080109@relst.nl> <0558889B-6B6C-40E2-95DD-70DDA98B51F4@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Gradwell-MongoId: 534711d3.640d-17d6-2 X-Gradwell-Auth-Method: mailbox X-Gradwell-Auth-Credentials: fbsd@pop3.dgmm.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:49:16 -0000 On Wednesday 09 April 2014 10:52:57 Matthew Pherigo wrote: > So you really want just to see the versions, and then you upgrade them by > hand. In that case, the correct option would indeed be "pkg version". pkg version is so sloooooow I use portversion from portupgrade package. It's much, much faster. portversion -l \< or portversion -L =