From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 21 20:58:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4505106566B; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@jroberson.net) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA428FC15; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so6140331vws.13 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.193.193 with SMTP id dv1mr1334758vcb.95.1300741122313; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.198] ([72.253.42.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b26sm3995229vby.3.2011.03.21.13.58.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:02:10 -1000 (HST) From: Jeff Roberson X-X-Sender: jroberson@desktop To: Michael Moll In-Reply-To: <20110321174753.GB32285@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> Message-ID: References: <4D840BD0.4030306@freebsd.org> <201103200000.p2K00pue003373@chez.mckusick.com> <20110320162212.GI1606@alchemy.franken.de> <20110321174753.GB32285@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Jeff Roberson , Kirk McKusick , Gavin Atkinson , Nathan Whitehorn , Marius Strobl , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r219667 - head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:58:43 -0000 On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Michael Moll wrote: > Hi All, > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:22:12PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: >> I fear it's still a bit premature for enable SU+J by default. Rather >> recently I was told about a SU+J filesystems lost after a panic >> that happend after snapshotting it (report CC'ed, maybe he can >> provide some more details) and I'm pretty sure I've seen the problem >> described in PR 149022 also after the potential fix mentioned in its >> feedback. > > Sorry, no details available, as I didn't record the panic and problems > back then. However this was not the first panic which I attribute (maybe > wrongly) to SUJ and as an consequence now all my UFS filesystems have > SUJ turned off again. If SUJ really is going to be the default I would > expact quite some fallout from this after my experiences. > How long ago was this? We fixed quite a number of bugs a few months ago. Thanks, Jeff > Kind Regards > -- > Michael Moll >