From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 24 9:30:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE1E1506E; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 09:30:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA35711; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:29:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ps on 4.0-current In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 24 Nov 1999 09:18:00 MST." <199911241618.JAA20883@harmony.village.org> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:29:30 +0100 Message-ID: <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199911241618.JAA20883@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: >In message <199911241601.JAA20734@harmony.village.org> Warner Losh writes: >: sef has sent me patches that I've not had a chance to review that >: appear to implement this. > >Actually, these patches do something else. My mistake for reading >them before caffeine. So please explain the logic you want implemented once people have stopped haggeling about it, it is rather trivial. I pressume we want the same policy for /proc/*/cmdline as for the sysctl ps(1) uses ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message