From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 9 18:43:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DA9E31 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 18:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ukaszg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647638FC0A for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 18:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fw7so5564822vcb.13 for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:43:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=mDGNLVHM1gFjHxWYyqhOOMocWD+S3dkkY6rj+DwonVc=; b=mw+FEIJAprPPJYoLx16dV1HT+2sg5te0M4qHAoqlQyDmEhPLOs82rHruAE8RwM4C4X lp3s1cWlGEihjwaPMWIeHUAdKZcoQqUJRPR2kbF4EoI5EFqcmBaxy5fhdMwjvG4jvoM3 sJju7aUWlAK1A5NRsvHgqvpDWZNd+9gX2G/ijaOEWjGvzAXLfgj/VW+RQXhMMqIEEp3l lVjw9ThhMAwAkjZEgvTg58K6uLx6mTTKGnpmBAYvpjGp0Opl+031C+cY333B1m1GiH+o OaPfj5a1agyWXPQq7gdvuGUROBfAZF51jnn9Q5JfwWAZ5c5TxR2DwemXfQg7z5+kHyeK gZCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.154.68 with SMTP id n4mr11196016vcw.22.1352486588471; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:43:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.236.1 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 10:43:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.236.1 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 10:43:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 19:43:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: portmaster or ports (packaging) problem ? From: uki Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 18:43:09 -0000 But theese are different packages (different names). since ports dont have any equivalent of debian "provides" flag it is impossible to figure it out in a safe way. 09-11-2012 19:19, "jb" napisa=C5=82(a): > Hi, > I hit a problem today during a system update. > > There were two libxul ports: > /usr/ports/www/libxul > /usr/ports/www/libxul19 > of which the last one was installed: > /var/db/pkg/libxul-1.9.2.28_1/ > > There was a port to update which died on error: > # portmaster icedtea-web > ... > =3D=3D=3D>>> The dependency for www/libxul > seems to be handled by libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > ... > =3D=3D=3D> Found libxul-1.9.2.28_1, but you need to upgrade to libxul>= =3D10. > *** [build-depends] Error code 1 > ... > # > > So, I had to manually deinstall www/libxul19 and install www/libxul and t= ry > again. > > # portmaster icedtea-web > ... > =3D=3D=3D>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed= : > Upgrade icedtea-web-1.3_1 to icedtea-web-1.3.1 > Install www/libxul > ... > # > > Is the portmaster to blame for not being smart enough and not taking step= s > of deinstalling www/libxul19 and installing www/libxul in one step ? > jb > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >