From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 11 03:52:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91EF19A0 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 03:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C8821BAD for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 03:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id lf10so4850516pab.13 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:52:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=sfjfT7NPRgHQdVlNhwhX5KzzgRM1Hfsd2RXP977rr3M=; b=cCXxX+1LXmiQOWQ+C6BwtXaKitN7Vho0kJNpCTvR96+OuUJ7VOpVb4t5D3cy0bfzLk PlWOw6DSfqKQphLroFB7YOwi7FTq0E+YsqymMxwviZlkflT2/gqwJVk2kGbmFym+087a 2fWvOErhdxhn4ZVpY5kzZ3b6dvBOGMbemqEb7I+PhjJMvURPge37paX4yDQkkqbfvv6R OlMoLreshJr32H/joZyBiFf9IDQ/pj/0U++RrYVwCIFA+eGmmET5doydBx2H3N6eriO4 Vr5OtnB4lcsBrACclhRB2/cfhsamzddPwYE8mtRwWjIjYBx7Ypz/R7UUyLeIcVhJuH26 GF4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+Y1NAvsRnFr2J2JQpONvUOvW3zs+HZmhTUFmPXUUIAhxX/EOzOEwbs3vPLjQ/K2vfIj4/ X-Received: by 10.66.136.71 with SMTP id py7mr24617702pab.2.1397188348954; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bonsai.localnet ([207.55.102.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fn2sm29166966pab.38.2014.04.10.20.52.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [192.168.193.34]) by bonsai.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4D93D5BE for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB945CD46 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s3B3qPKx093049; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:52:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Handbook, upgrading ports incorrect with 10.0-RELEASE? References: <534520DE.5060005@relst.nl> <534565E9.8080109@relst.nl> <0558889B-6B6C-40E2-95DD-70DDA98B51F4@gmail.com> <4634538.SMM6loVsS1@amd.asgard.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:52:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4634538.SMM6loVsS1@amd.asgard.uk> (dgmm's message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:49:06 +0100") Message-ID: <87k3aw4j5y.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 03:52:36 -0000 dgmm writes: > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 10:52:57 Matthew Pherigo wrote: >> So you really want just to see the versions, and then you upgrade them by >> hand. In that case, the correct option would indeed be "pkg version". > > pkg version is so sloooooow > > I use portversion from portupgrade package. It's much, much faster. > > portversion -l \< > > or > > portversion -L = I usually compare against the pkg repository with 'pkg version -RL=', or you could compare against the INDEX file with 'pkg version -IL='. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org