From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 19:46:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4535216A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF8D43D66 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:46:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 29864 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2006 19:46:02 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Aug 2006 19:46:02 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 801A528449; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:46:01 -0400 (EDT) To: Garrett Cooper References: <200608211444.50152.gerard@seibercom.net> <44EA0352.7020206@u.washington.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:46:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44EA0352.7020206@u.washington.edu> (Garrett Cooper's message of "Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:02:42 -0700") Message-ID: <44irkl27pi.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] CVSUP (was "Re: Was: Re: Why This Infinite Loop??") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:46:07 -0000 Garrett Cooper writes: > Gerard Seibert wrote: >> IMHO, it might be a lot easier for him to use portsnap. Especially >> if he is not familiar with the FBSD ports system. Just my opinion >> though. > CVSUP isn't that difficult IMHO to learn, and is a better, more > efficient way to download the ports Makefiles. In what way? For typical applications, lower bandwidth usage is supposedly an advantage of portsnap. > It will take him all of > 10-20 minutes to configure if he reads the documentation and uses the > example file. I would think so. And it can be used with arbitrary cvs trees, including the FreeBSD source tree. On the other hand, it doesn't come in the FreeBSD base system, and it doesn't sign the updates. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/