From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Sun Dec 20 21:45:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57503A4EA48; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [87.98.149.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27DE61974; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:45:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: How to define the order of starting jails? From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <1450646902.27618.19.camel@michaeleichorn.com> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:45:08 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1AC66193-4091-4D5A-8183-FAECA843A739@odo.in-berlin.de> References: <5D6BA0FE-60E1-4C6B-906B-BB62A1AB9BE8@odo.in-berlin.de> <1450639510.27618.8.camel@michaeleichorn.com> <1450646902.27618.19.camel@michaeleichorn.com> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail.kaan-bock.invalid X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:45:13 -0000 Michael B. Eichorn wrote: >=20 > On Sun, 2015-12-20 at 20:57 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote: >> Michael B. Eichorn wrote: >>> Does `service jail restart` do what you are looking for? >>=20 >> Bingo! That made the trick! Thank you very, very much! Cool! That >> command is stopping and starting jails in the order as listed in >> "jail_list". Ok, it isn't stopping jails in the reverse order, but >> that is no big deal, though. >=20 > I think that this came up before and there was a patch sumbitted to > stop in the reverse order, It might be fixed in current. I don't = really > remember the specifics and I cannot find it now, but something was = done > about this before. Ok. I'm following stable, thus it might arrive soon. But, at least at my = servers, that is no big deal. Stopping is so fast =E2=80=A6 (only 8 = service jails). But there might be conditions where reverse order might = be of advantage. >> [Arrrgh, I never heard of "service" before (after so many years with >> FBSD) :-( What a shame ...] >=20 > Always more to learn. :) Yep, definitely so! [And I did start programming/computing with = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDP-11 ;-)] With kind regards, Michael