From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 11:45:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A73616A41F; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:45:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5828D43D58; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:45:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with SMTP id j7JBjEPn017082; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:45:14 +0300 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7JBjCua003009; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:45:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7JBjCOF003008; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:45:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:45:12 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Christian Brueffer Message-ID: <20050819114511.GC2675@flame.pc> References: <1124443940.5851.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20050819110414.GA2588@flame.pc> <20050819111214.GE1769@unixpages.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050819111214.GE1769@unixpages.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: axing <4.2 instructions from Handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:45:18 -0000 On 2005-08-19 13:12, Christian Brueffer wrote: >On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:04:14PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> On 2005-08-19 11:32, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> > What's the sentiment on 'FreeBSD 4.2 and older' instruction in kernel >> > building chapter of Handbook? I'd like to delete them. >> >> FWIW, >> >> I kind of support this, as long as there are no serious objections from >> people actively using 4.X versions older than the current HEAD of >> RELENG_4. > > I'd say nuke it. I think we can safely assume that people using that > old releases know how to build a kernel. Hehe! Hopefully :)