From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 4 19:15:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2A216A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 19:15:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from deimos.aros.net (deimos.aros.net [66.219.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FBE43D1F for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 19:15:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@josh.aros.net) Received: from [10.0.1.37] (firebat.aros.net [66.219.192.36]) by deimos.aros.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i94JFNoq020498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:15:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from lists@josh.aros.net) Message-ID: <4161A218.6060506@josh.aros.net> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:18:48 -0600 From: Josh Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <1096915733.41619b153c86a@webmail.inf.ufrgs.br> <20041004145927.74ad8b47.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20041004145927.74ad8b47.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on deimos.aros.net cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: regi@inf.ufrgs.br Subject: Re: C compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 19:15:25 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >regi@inf.ufrgs.br wrote: > > > >>Hello, >> >>I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own >>programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that >>FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled >>to linux. I checked several compile options, but it did not have good results. >> >> > >5.2.1 is not a strong performer. It's ALPHA code. > >If you want to do performance testing, either use 4.10, or work with the >5.3 BETAs. 5.2.1 isn't supposed to be fast yet. > > > I really don't think the problem is that simple. How about either giving him a real answer or none at all? Cheers.