From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 2 15:31:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA19918 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 15:31:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.gtn.com (mail.gtn.com [194.77.0.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA19876 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 15:31:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id AAA26274; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 00:30:06 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id AAA26895; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 00:26:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19981203002629.A26879@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 00:26:29 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Eivind Eklund , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? References: <19981202172824.A23747@klemm.gtn.com> <8701.912631921@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <8701.912631921@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 12:52:01PM -0800 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 12:52:01PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > The offer -STABLE source and -CURRENT Snaps. > > Things they are working on is: > > > > - IPv6 > > - IPsec > > - advanced packet queuing, ATM, mobility,.... > > One has to ask the obvious question, however: The existing IPSec stuff > that's been submitted for commit approval is fully functional and > currently in use at several sites in Europe. If we went to the KAME > stuff right now, today, would we be able to offer these users the same > degree of functionality or would KAME represent a "loss" from their > perspective? Could the people you mention evaluate KAME on a 2.2.7 system ? Or could perhaps a dialogue between those people and KAME developers help to do the right decision ? I personally don't know people using IPsec... Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message