From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 12:09:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEB116A406 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biogary@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A552E13C4BD for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biogary@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so169007ana for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:09:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JTunGY1huEOiZnDylEjz9ZcXWEaL6SD99K3S61cWFXtFgM+3xj2WCkmD/wStkN72YUfc78rQMNsKkav/lWIOsouRLLYKAqHbB4vkr5y8jdaeuvVbnSgiEMtKDHFeHc8NAsTqkhH7phiicWW55wU+OBx4Au9HHj9hk53Qx5SPEkU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tn9yK7zZf2k/jxBSWdNIuXbMvrPGhUFjYk8VEG/r5Bd//vq9xHyPO5+bSq3oNutlsBb+LnFZBBpSI69+j9h4bYRLfRjpvoNHDDfN6O7vE6t9Tn4cx02JRck4xuOeZAHti6sX5ImYqES9qUuPjBlLLRcpj67IQwvyTnMRq6tGHCw= Received: by 10.100.127.1 with SMTP id z1mr345720anc.1176293361656; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.31.17 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <224a745a0704110509o17941a25tc1d4b8080f0841e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:09:21 +0800 From: "Tzu-Hua Wang" To: "Ivan Voras" In-Reply-To: <461CB798.8010501@fer.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <224a745a0704092137h67f5f463w6b355535a6b8415f@mail.gmail.com> <224a745a0704110245n30b2859ew7673406e33b61b10@mail.gmail.com> <461CB798.8010501@fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the performance of SAS is not better than SCSI in FreeBSD, WHY? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: thwang@mail.nhcue.edu.tw List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:09:23 -0000 2007/4/11, Ivan Voras : > > Tzu-Hua Wang wrote: > > Hi: > > > > Thank you for your response. > > > > Ther performance of your server is significantly better than mine. > > Only in seek times, but this may be an artifact of RAID1. Do you use > 2.5" or 3.5" disks? 2.5" > The SAS Chip of my HP ProLiant DL380 G5 is Smart HP Smart Array P400. > > Mine was E200i. > > > It uses the FreeBSD driver ciss0 > > Same here. > > > I think that there is only one difference between your HP server and > > mine. > > > > I configure my SAS HD as RAID 0. > > > > Will this affect the performance? > > RAID should be much faster than RAID1 for the kind of tests diskinfo > performs. > > Do you mean that RAID 0 perform better than RAID 1? How about RAID 5? Thank you