From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 20 13:07:27 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C781416A41A; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsdp@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [213.186.42.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9848C13C458; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsdp@davenulle.org) Received: from roxette.lamaiziere.net (unknown [77.192.6.23]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D1311805AA; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:07:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:07:22 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071020150722.66adab5e@roxette.lamaiziere.net> In-Reply-To: <47154405.3030106@FreeBSD.org> References: <20071014223933.27730098@roxette.lamaiziere.net> <4712B1D4.4000108@FreeBSD.org> <20071016221808.43b7f702@roxette.lamaiziere.net> <47151EA4.80605@FreeBSD.org> <20071017000758.3ff8cf1f@roxette.lamaiziere.net> <47154405.3030106@FreeBSD.org> Organization: /dave/nulle X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Smarteiffel is marked broken but is not (maybe!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:07:27 -0000 Le Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:06:45 +0200, Kris Kennaway : Hello, > > I compiled the install program with full assertions and it crashs > > with a run-time stack dump. Looking the code it seems related to the > > memory management by SmartEiffel (it is not good because there is a > > garbage collector). So may be it is broken. I was wrong, this is because a stupid bug when assertions are on. I'm the first one who tried it with full assertions ON... > > I will check it with FreeBSD 6.2 and another C compiler and try to > > get more informations. > > Try building it "normally" but with MALLOC_OPTIONS=AJ. This is > enabled for port builds (and by default in CURRENT) and sometimes > catches application bugs. No it does not change anything. I don't know why it failed on the tinderbox and i can't reproduce this problem. SmartEiffel is marked broken since july, can it be only a temporary problem during the evolution of CURRENT ? Regards.