From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 29 09:57:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5258F7; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD8F0D9C; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A46438BE; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 03:40:00 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <533686CE.6040706@marino.st> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:39:42 +0100 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Abthorpe , marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LPPL10 license consequences intended? (arabic/arabtex) References: <532DC88A.7010104@marino.st> <532DFDB2.1090200@cyberleo.net> <532ED19F.1090100@marino.st> <533541E5.6040003@marino.st> <20140329031431.GA21162@village.abthorpe.org> In-Reply-To: <20140329031431.GA21162@village.abthorpe.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: CyberLeo Kitsana , Kevin Oberman , "ports@FreeBSD.org Ports" , Nicola Vitale X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:57:41 -0000 On 3/29/2014 04:14, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:33:25AM +0100, John Marino wrote: >> It's been a few days and there's been no response to this. >> Should I assume that tabthorpe@ read this but is not prepared to review >> his work? > > There is an old adage about assumptions, I am sure you know what it is. > Maybe I am just ignoring you. > Maybe, just maybe, my mail system has been sideways for a week, and this > is the first time I have been able to sit down and properly catch up on > emails. > You decide what answer suits you best. Look, you had several days to chime in on this topic. I am not going to put at the top of my list of possibilities that your email system is broken. Yes, it's possible. Many other options are far more likely. I'll go with door#2 > Long story short, I have been extremely distracted by life outside of > FreeBSD, as a result I will be stepping down from my responsibilities > later this spring, as I have not been able to deal with everything on my > plate. If that is the case, you should do exactly this. > If you would like to take over the licensing stuff, I will be happy to > assign your name to it. *this* is a crappy attitude though. This is "I did something, but you clean it up." You can drop out, that's fine, but I'd expect somebody would at least be interested in their old work. How much time are are talking here? 10-20 minutes? You're going to write this sob story and try to shift this to others for a 20 minute job? All you had to say was, "That was 3 years ago, I'm sorry if I didn't get it exactly right, but I'm not going to review again" without all this backstory. I would work-ethically disagree with it, but I would respect you for saving us all 5 days of limbo. Obviously I'm not going to take over licensing. But this probably falls back to portmgr responsibility. I don't get your attitude given that you are not only portmanager (still) but actually was involved with this. If the portmgr group leaves this up to me, I'm going to disable this LPPL licenses and remove it from arabtex. How is that for dealing with it? John